Ukraine attacks oil drilling platforms off Crimea coast: Official | Russia-Ukraine war News

Head of Moscow-controlled Crimea says three individuals had been injured, seven lacking after Ukraine fired on Black Sea oil drilling platforms.

The governor of Moscow-controlled Crimea has stated three individuals had been injured and 7 are lacking after Ukraine fired on three oil drilling platforms within the Black Sea off the Russian-annexed peninsula.

“We affirm that there are three injured and 7 reported lacking. We assure that the search will proceed,” Governor Sergey Aksyonov stated on Telegram on Monday, referring to platforms of the Crimea-based oil and gasoline firm Chernomorneftegaz.

That is the primary reported strike towards the offshore vitality infrastructure in Crimea since Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24.

Aksyonov, put in by Russia because the peninsula’s governor after the 2014 annexation by Moscow, had beforehand stated 5 individuals had been injured within the assault earlier than revising the casualty figures.

He stated three platforms had been focused, triggering the evacuation of 94 individuals on the websites, whereas 15 troopers remained to protect them.

A search and rescue operation was persevering with by air and sea, he stated.

Chernomorneftegaz, sanctioned by the US since 2014, operates a number of gasoline and oil fields within the Black Sea and within the Sea of Azov.

Aksyonov stated that one platform had been hit, and Olga Kovitidi, a Russian senator for Crimea, advised the RIA Novosti company that there have been no victims on the 2 different platforms that had been focused within the assault.

The Ukrainian army stated a meals warehouse within the Black Sea port of Odesa was destroyed in a Russian missile assault, however no civilians had been killed.

The town has come beneath sporadic bombardment for the reason that begin of the struggle and is blockaded by the Russian navy, whereas both sides accuses the opposite of laying mines within the sea.

Ukraine’s Operational Command “South” stated Russian forces had fired 14 missiles at southern Ukraine throughout a three-hour barrage “in impotent anger on the successes of our troops”.

Russia’s army didn’t instantly touch upon the experiences.

Who is watching the watchmen of the United Kingdom? | Opinions

What does the resignation of PM’s ethics adviser Lord Geidt – and the little impression it had – tells us about government energy in Britain?

There’s a Latin maxim from Juvenal, “quis custodiet ipsos custodes” (who shall guard the guardians). The best of all comedian ebook writers, Alan Moore, translated it as “who shall watch the watchmen”. It’s a downside each constitutional order – historic and trendy, and actual or imagined – has to deal with, and options are invariably elusive.

In the UK, we now have the workplace of the prime minister. It’s a curious place, regardless of its manifest significance. The position is hardly recognised in regulation, and there are few acts of parliament that even point out it. The powers of the prime minister come from the confluence of what flows from two constitutional sources.

The primary is the royal prerogative. This incorporates the theoretical proper of the monarch to organise the state. In apply, it signifies that the prime minister of the day can appoint or sack ministers, management the enterprise of the cupboard and even determine what different ministers are advised or not advised.

The second is the supremacy of parliament. Because of this the federal government of the day will often have management over what laws is handed and what revenues are raised.

A major minister in charge of each authorities and parliament has due to this fact the best reward that the structure of the UK can bestow.

However in order to maintain this absolute energy from corrupting the manager completely, numerous gadgets have been tried once in a while. One is the so-called “Ministerial Code”, which units out guidelines on ministerial conduct, with its personal specialist adviser, who might be a distinguished and unbiased public servant.

The issue is that the code and the adviser haven’t any autonomy. The code is regardless of the prime minister says it says. The code, just like the adviser, is a creature of the prime minister. No investigations may be instigated in opposition to prime ministerial opposition, and the adviser can’t insist on getting their method. The distinguished public servant turns into not a servant of the general public, however of the prime minister.

The ignored or annoyed adviser on ministerial conduct is left with one actual energy: the style of their departure. For it is just by their resignation that they will make a noise that may be heard by others within the political and media class in order to warn one thing critical is up.

And the surprising resignation final week by the most recent such adviser to Prime Minister Boris Johnson actually did make a noise, for a short time. The departing adviser Christopher Geidt additionally set out expressly the explanation for this resignation. The prime minister, Lord Geidt mentioned, wished to intentionally break the Ministerial Code. This was not an unintended incident of non-compliance, however deliberate and within the face of significant objections.

This resignation ought to have been a political sensation, triggering a disaster and maybe the prime minister’s resignation. However the departure has barely registered outdoors the political and media class, and even their consideration has shortly moved on. The resignation ought to have raised an alarm: ultimately, it raised hardly a murmur.

The prime minister and his supporters have, in impact, simply shrugged at this resignation. Certainly, as an alternative of resigning, the prime minister now seeks to rid himself of this turbulent type of oversight.

The gadgets of the Ministerial Code and of its adviser have been solely ever fig-leaves, obscuring the true nature of the uncooked government energy beneath.

And so the traditional and trendy downside endures: how do you guard in opposition to these in energy? Who watches those that watch you?

The views expressed on this article are the writer’s personal and don’t essentially replicate Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.

North Korea reports 18,820 more ‘fever’ cases amid COVID outbreak | Coronavirus pandemic News

Declining case numbers comes as specialists have expressed doubt the N Korea has been in a position to deliver outbreak beneath management.

North Korea recorded 18,820 extra circumstances of fever and no new deaths amid its first official COVID-19 outbreak, state media stated on Monday, as authorities proceed to insist infections within the impoverished nation are being introduced beneath management.

The nation has reported greater than 4.6 million circumstances of fever throughout its first official outbreak, however authorities haven’t revealed what number of of these sufferers examined optimistic for the coronavirus. Authorities on Friday reported simply greater than 23,100 circumstances of fever, marking the third consecutive day reported infections stayed beneath 30,000.

Earlier than acknowledging the outbreak in mid-Could, Pyongyang had claimed to be freed from COVID-19, a document doubted by many observers because of the coronavirus’ acute transmissibility and the nation’s huge land border with China.

The secretive regime, dominated by third-generation dictator Kim Jong Un, has refused outdoors assist, together with vaccinations, regardless of widespread malnutrition and a dilapidated healthcare system.

The World Well being Group has expressed scepticism about North Korea’s declare that the outbreak is waning, warning that circumstances are underreported and the scenario might be deteriorating. Formally often known as the Democratic Individuals’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), the nation has reported simply 73 deaths to this point, effectively beneath what could be anticipated for an outbreak involving tens of millions of infections.

It additionally reported final week an outbreak of an unidentified gastrointestinal disease, suspected to be cholera or typhoid, within the nation’s southwest.

Tim Peters, the founding father of Seoul-based help organisation Serving to Palms Korea Seoul, stated it’s seemingly North Korea is underplaying the extent of the disaster within the nation.

“What else however COVID might the sudden 4.6 million fevers because the DPRK’s mid-Could admission of COVID circumstances be? Authorities there have each cause to be gravely involved that its rickety medical system will endure a tsunami of circumstances and be overwhelmed,” Peters instructed Al Jazeera.

“We at HHK have been struggling mightily since early this yr to ship medicines to the North, however officers there insist on capturing themselves within the foot by stonewalling any crucially wanted deliveries. Extra proof, if any extra is required, that the well being and welfare of the rank and file in North Korea are nowhere close to a significant precedence, as tragic as that reality is.”